Juba vs Lusaka
Side-by-side comparison for digital nomads
$1,542
Juba
$1,367
Lusaka
1
Mbps
20
Mbps
N/A
Juba
Moderate
Lusaka
5/5
Juba
5/5
Lusaka
N/A
Juba
High
Lusaka
230.2k
Juba
1.7m
Lusaka
Juba (South Sudan) and Lusaka (Zambia) are both in Africa, offering different takes on the nomad lifestyle. Here is how they compare across the metrics that matter most.
Cost of Living
Lusaka has a modest cost advantage at $1367/mo compared to Juba's $1542/mo — a 11% gap that matters over time.
Internet & Infrastructure
For bandwidth-intensive work, Lusaka has a clear edge at 20 Mbps (#167 globally) compared to Juba's 1 Mbps (#0).
Quality of Life
Both Juba and Lusaka share the same safety rating — travelers can feel equally comfortable in either city.
Healthcare quality is rated similarly in both Juba and Lusaka.
Monthly Weather Comparison
The best time to visit Juba is October (around 38 degrees, 1mm rain, score 327), while Lusaka peaks in April (27 degrees, 0mm rain, score 402). Timing your stay around these months can make a big difference in your experience.
Cost of Living
Internet & Infrastructure
Environment & Health
Quality of Life
Monthly Weather Comparison
Who Should Choose Juba?
- Clean air with a 5/5 air quality score
- Smaller city feel with 230.2k residents
- Peak season in October — 38 degrees, score 327
Who Should Choose Lusaka?
- Great for budget nomads — monthly costs around $1367
- Clean air with a 5/5 air quality score
- Family-friendly at $806.9391088542649/mo for families
- Peak season in April — 27 degrees, score 402
Overall Verdict
The data favors Lusaka as the more well-rounded choice. At $1367/mo versus Juba's $1542/mo, that is a 11% saving that adds up significantly on an extended stay.
Granular Price Comparison
Lower is better for all cost items.
Data from Open-Meteo (weather) and global internet speed rankings. Updated monthly.